Friday, 31 July 2015


Week 3 Reflection- Grace Miller s0242997

This is the link to my blog- http://gracemiller95.blogspot.com.au/


Technical Aspects-

This reflection will focus on the technical elements of the online spaces: Blog, Wiki and the website creator, Weebly and will also discuss the importance of integrating these spaces in education. These online spaces provide teachers and students the opportunity to populate the digital platforms with their own content.
It was brought to my attention this week that there are two types of ‘phrases’ that construct the World Wide Web. These include Web 1.0, which is the readable only phrase. Content does not change for different viewers and only the web masters can add and edit content themselves. The second phrase I was enlightened to was Web 2.0, which is quite the opposite to Web 1.0 as it is owned by the people, not just one author. Individuals and groups can publish, share, network and download using an online space. Tools and toolbars are embedded into programs such as the ‘edit’ and ‘save’ button on a Wiki page.
It is important to note that these online spaces should only be used when there are clear learning benefits for the students. It is also important that the learning that occurs in the classroom is generated through the use of digital technologies is unable to occur in any other way. A further vital element of utilising technology in schools is that the students must be using the tools to support their learning, not the teacher presenting information through ICT.
All three of the online spaces that are of focus this week ensure users sign up by creating a username or webpage and a personal password. This provides security for learners, which in the scenario of a classroom is imperative. When students are engaged in a Wikispace, their contributions may appear anonymously. However as they are signed in to the account, their teacher will be able to view their work and keep track on their progress. It is essential that teachers can continually assess their learners’ work. The author of a blog or Weebly must have signed into their account before commencing editing.
The online spaces can be customised to suit the needs and wants of authors and participants. Backgrounds, layouts, images, titles, text, font, videos and many other technical aspects can be altered or deleted.
Participants may provide feedback on their peer’s blogs, however websites do not allow this function as they are static and only allow communication in the form of a one-way conversation. Participants and the author of a Wiki may communicate due to the fact that the online space is a collaborative tool.
The online spaces may be independent or may link to each other. For instance the Weebly website allows users to link a blog. Websites can be linked to Wikis and Blogs. This is a great resource in the classroom as teachers can select specific learning webpage links that they want their students to view and then can further discuss their findings on the Wikispace or blog.
As technology develops in the world, the opportunities in classrooms grow. Students can embed videos, websites, images and many other functions in blogs, websites and Wikis. These three online spaces have been constructed for a range of different purposes, however they all aim for ideas and thoughts to be shared through technology.

Teaching Context- SWOT

Blogs

Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
·    Can enhance the ability of students to self reflect and process concepts
·    An individualised tool for one learner
·    Can be used for implementing various levels of Bloom’s taxonomy
·    Enables students to analyse and synthesis
·    Formative assessment
·    Teachers can evaluate the blog throughout the entire learning process
·    Enables students to compare and contrast various aspects of what they have internalised.
·    A sense of empowerment is achieved
·    ‘Own voice’ developed
·    An individualised tool for one learner
·    Adequate amount of time is necessary to allow learners the time to complete tasks at a satisfactory level
·    Learners work at different speeds
·    If teachers do not effectively contextualize the use of any Web 2.0 tool, then the students are unlikely to regard the tool as beneficial
·    The blog being used must be necessary to the learning process
·    Can only be implemented when there are concepts for students to reflect on
·    Teachers must carefully assess the specific learning outcomes they seek, and then they determine which tool- NOT vice versa
·    There must be a certain amount of content preparation prior to students implementing the blogging as students could blog about useful topics
·    Inappropriate or unkind feedback may be provided to students by their peers
Wikispace

Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
· Ideal when a teacher is seeking reactions from a collective group
·      A never ending, paginated sheet of online butchers paper
· Children’s ideas can run wild
· A living, ecological entity
· Supports intellectual trust (people, the process, and content)
· Equitable tool as it is anonymous (to peers)
· An inviting and open learning space/platform
· Allows all learners to have a voice
· Technology skills are developed
· Students can work to together to create class notes; each contributing to what each can remember or knows to create complete and comprehensive notes
·           Can not be more than one editor at a time
·           Only one participant’s work will be saved if two are working at the same time
·            
  • Technical literacies may be utilised
  • Cognitive development- students learn through interaction with one another
  • Multi-media and tools can be embedded in a wiki
  • Groups can coordinate ideas
  • Essential buttons – ‘save’ and ‘edit’
  • Scaffolding is essential
  • Students can possibly copy one another’s work
  • If not enough scaffolding is presented, students may become distracted










Static Website- Weebly

Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
  • Great for collaboration tasks
  • Through a website, students can share their learning, access resources and connect with their teachers, peers and world
  • Students’ accounts can be created that teachers can moderate from a central dashboard
  • An engaging digital tool
  • Bright, colourful layouts are optional
  • Easy to learn the basics
  • Straight forward
  • Multiple functions: announcements, class calendar, homework, study lists, post student work, classroom and policies
  • Much more informative than a blog or wiki
  • Does not integrate collaboration
  • Students with work well with pairs may struggle using this personal digital tool
  • It is the first service that allows users to easily create a high quality website
  • Can provide a portal between home and school communication
  • Enhance classroom learning
  • Students can embed: photo galleries, student work, slideshows, YouTube clips, Google Maps and more!
  • Cyber bullying is possible
  • Some students may not receive feedback
  • Feedback may be negative and not presented kindly
  •  






SAMR Model

Blogging

Substitution- The task is the same but the tools are different.
Personal thoughts and ideas are traditionally hand written with a pen on paper, are now scribed on a blog entry.
Augmentation- The task is the same but tools are different and there are added functionalities.
Students compose their blog entry and are also able to upload an image or link a webpage.
Modification- Redesign new parts of the task
Student may record their blog post using an audio component and upload this.
Redefinition- Use technology to create imperceptibly new tasks.
Students may be required to explain the challenges they had whilst setting up their blog by using a variety of tools such as linking a Voki, wiki, creating a mind map and posting a YouTube clip.

Wikispace

Substitution- The task is the same but the tools are different.
Instead of group using butchers map to list their ideas, students create a Wiki account and type their ideas on a page.
Augmentation- The task is the same but tools are different and there are added functionalities.
Students copy and paste images to their list to show examples instead of typing words.
Modification- Redesign new parts of the task
Students add feedback to their peers’ comments on the Wiki.
Redefinition- Use technology to create imperceptibly new tasks.
Utilising scaffolding, students complete tasks as a collaborative group such as filling out graphic organisers. Teachers should aim for their students to be practicing higher order thinking skills in this phase.

Static Website- Weebly

Substitution- The task is the same but the tools are different.
A website is a great digital space. Images and text can be presented on a Weebly when students are presenting to their peers.
Augmentation- The task is the same but tools are different and there are added functionalities.

Students utilise the image and auditory functions on the website.
Modification- Redesign new parts of the task
Students can link websites to specific pages on their Weebly.
Redefinition- Use technology to create imperceptibly new tasks.
A website is created by the classroom teacher. Tasks are scaffolded for the learners. Students must complete these tasks and navigate through the site. Word documents will be uploaded on the site for students to download and complete digitally and then to be uploaded to the site for teacher feedback.

Exploration of functions of technology demonstrated in practice

Below is links to several Weeblys that I have created. I thoroughly enjoy using blogs and I can see the benefits of using them in the classroom.



ALSO! Here is a Weebly that I created today just to test out my skills. I still have them! I created this Weebly based on the topic of Europe trip as this is important to me currently as I am planning a trip next year.



Below is the link to my Blog that is constantly being updated. Please note that I have been made aware that there is a bug on my blog. When visitors click on my link it takes them to my page and then an advertisement appears and my blog site disappears.




Below is the link to my Wikispace that I created this week. It is very basic, but I created an account and spent a satisfactory amount of time examining how to use the online space. I was even able to link a website. Yay! I understand I will be using this tool in assessment task two. I look forward to using this online space with ease.










I found this fantastic image developed by Kathy Schrock (2013) that demonstrates the relationship between Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy and the SAMR Model. Please see below.







References


Educational Technology and Mobile Learning. (2015). SAMR Model Explained for Teachers. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from Educator's Technology: http://www.educatorstechnology.com/2013/06/samr-model-explained-for-teachers.html

Klingensmith, K. (2010, January 10). Ten Free Web 2.0 Tools for the Classroom. Retrieved July 28, 2015, from Once a teacher: https://onceateacher.wordpress.com/about/

Moodle. (2015). Web 2.0. Retrieved July 28, 2015, from Moodle: https://moodle.cqu.edu.au/mod/page/view.php?id=101679

Schrock, K. (2013). SAMR Model Musings. Retrieved July 31, 2015, from Kathy Schrock's Kaffeeklatsh: http://blog.kathyschrock.net/2013/11/sarm-model-musings.html

Weebly Inc. (2015). About Us. Retrieved July 30, 2015, from Weebly: http://www.weebly.com/about/

WittyCookie. (2012, June 4). What are the major differences among Web 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0? Retrieved July 28, 2015, from WittyCookie: https://wittycookie.wordpress.com/2012/06/04/what-are-the-major-differences-among-web-1-0-2-0-and-3-0/



1 comment:

  1. As you can all see my tables did not turn out quite right and my image has not appeared (yet!). All a learning curve I say!

    ReplyDelete